Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BALLARD v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BALLARD
Defendant:
MURRAY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Ballard v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2020cv01623
Defendant:
Scranton Police, City of Scranton and Gallagher
Plaintiff:
Tawanda Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv00139
Defendant:
YAHEEDAH HILLIARD, LOUIS MOORE, JULLIAN and others
Plaintiff:
THERMUTHIS BALLARD LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04740
Plaintiff:
MALIK BALLARD
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, EDWARD KEPPELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolick et al v. Northeast Industrial Services Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bolick and Eileen B. Bolick
Defendant:
Northeast Industrial Services Corporation, William R. Williams, Jeff Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann et al v. Palmerton Area School District et al
as 3:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mann and Rose Mann
Defendant:
Palmerton Area School District , Palmerton Area School District Board of Education , Palmerton Area High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07926
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HENRY BALLARD, III
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATER DEPT., REVENUE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALLARD v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01627
Plaintiff:
ROMANCE BALLARD
Defendant:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTANA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv01657
Plaintiff:
ERIC SANTANA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
