Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PS) Cheung v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv01731
Plaintiff:
Michael Cheung
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James Cheung v. South Pasadena et al
as 2:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
James Cheung
Defendant:
South Pasadena, David G. Watkins, Angelica Frausto-Lupo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindblad v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2021cv06606
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Carlos G. Bolanos, Andrew Constentino, Jimmy Chung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Cheung v. Yoshinoya America, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03116
Plaintiff:
John Cheung
Defendant:
Does, San Pedro Corner, LLC and Yoshinoya America, Inc.
John Cheung v. Ek Him Lim Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03051
Plaintiff:
John Cheung
Defendant:
Does, Ek Him Lim Co., Inc. and Macco Investments Corporation
Robert Elguezabal v. Jimmy C. Trie et al
as 5:2014cv02215
Defendant:
Michelle Chao Hsun Cheung, Does, Jimmy C. Trie and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Elguezabal
Erica Henderson et al v. William T Fujioka et al
as 2:2012cv10494
Defendant:
Leroy David Baca, Leroy David Baca, Patricia Bennett-Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Henderson and Jeffrey Henderson
Garth v. John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) et al
as 4:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
John Garth
Defendant:
John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC), Vincent Cheung, Oak Center Towers Office Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garth v. John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) et al
as 3:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
John Garth
Defendant:
John Tennant Memorial-Episcopal Senior Communities (JTM-ESC) , Vincent Cheung, Oak Center Towers Office Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Cheung et al
as 2:2009cv01783
Plaintiff:
Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Caleb Cheung, Dale Hanssen and Dan Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
