Other Civil Rights Cases filed in New Jersey
HOLLAND v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2023cv02724
Plaintiff: MARIE HOLLAND
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CAPITAL REALTY GROUP, INC. doing business as PROSPECT PARK APARTMENTS CRG LLC, MOSHE EISCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. PATERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv07514
Plaintiff: CHENA JOHNSON
Defendant: PATERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff: KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant: SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REDFORD et al v. ABRUTYN et al
as 2:2011cv05130
Plaintiff: SAPHYRE REDFORD, DANIELLE BITON and CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON
Defendant: MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN, ED DWECK, KATHLEEN CARLA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA et al v. ROIZMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff: CAROLYN D. BETHEA , GLORIA D. ABNER and A CLASS OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE TENANTS AND PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS AT CAMDEN TOWNHOUSES II BROADWAY STREET
Defendant: ISRAEL ROIZMAN, ROIZMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC., KATHY HVASTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAHOOD v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2008cv03402
Plaintiff: GEORGE LAHOOD
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL, NJ SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
JAMES v. WALLS et al
as 3:2007cv00842
Plaintiff: SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant: WILLIAM H. WALLS, PATRICK J MONOHAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?