Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Clark v. Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Olga L. Orengo and Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, William Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callahan et al v. New Haven et al
as 3:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Tachica M. Callahan, Ronnjae T. Gordon, Ronnie T. Gordon, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department, New Haven Police Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon et al v. Slaiby et al
as 3:2019cv01177
Defendant:
Anthony Guiliano, Ryan Slaiby, Brendan Lundt and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon, Prince Gordon and Zipporah Greene-Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Presley, Leonard Johnson, Trevor Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Marcia Robinson
Hull v. Martel et al
as 3:2018cv00310
Defendant:
Jon Martel, Karen Martel, Julie Burt and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Martel et al
as 3:2018cv00297
Defendant:
Jon Martel, Karen Martel, Julie Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hull v. Hull et al
as 3:2017cv01525
Plaintiff:
Amanda R Hull
Defendant:
Jonathan L Hull , John Doe and Grace Baptist Church
Thirdparty_defendant:
Jon Martel, John Carbonneau, Holly Abery-Wetstone and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Jonathan L Hull
Counter_claimant:
Jonathan L Hull
Counter_defendant:
Amanda R Hull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
