Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Tucker v. Benefield et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff: Jared Tucker
Defendant: Herman Benefield, Logan Duke, Tyler Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bullock v. Paris et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff: Nicholas Bullock
Defendant: Charlie Paris, Hubert Parker, John Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff: Lindsey Licari
Defendant: Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. PROPES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00084
Defendant: R V WATTS, LOGAN PROPES and THE CITY OF MONROE
Plaintiff: WILLIAM OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Effingham County, Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00028
Defendant: Daniel Handshumaker, Matthew Logan, Effingham County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00062
Plaintiff: MELESSA HALL
Defendant: DENNIS LOGAN, NEALIE MCCORMICK and CITY OF PELHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. CITY OF PELHAM, GEORGIA et al
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff: LISA T DOE
Defendant: CITY OF PELHAM and DENNIS LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2016cv00140
Plaintiff: S R NICHOLS
Defendant: DENNIS RAY LOGAN and HILTON BRANDFUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOBLEY v. LOGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00141
Defendant: DENNIS RAY LOGAN and HILTON BRANDFUL
Plaintiff: T D MOBLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Battle et al
as 1:2014cv03824
Plaintiff: Christina Collins
Defendant: Tanja D. Battle, Richard Bennett, Logan Buzzy Nalley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?