Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Mission Inn et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Mission Inn, Mission Motel, Rochester Zen Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Naomi Bar-Lev
Defendant:
Does 1-100, City of San Diego, Jonathan Dungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Minty v. Tesla et al
as 3:2022cv03253
Plaintiff:
Fin Minty, Peggy Xue and Afin Minty
Defendant:
Tesla, Meta, MSFT Microsoft Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al
as 3:2019cv02407
Defendant:
Larry Page, John Does 1-29, Sergey Brin and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus A. Parsa, Judges, Uyghurs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Dana White v. Microsoft Mixed Reality Captured Studio et al
as 2:2019cv08863
Defendant:
Metastage Studios, Uber Corporation USA, Microsoft Mixed Reality Captured Studio and others
Plaintiff:
Dana White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epperson v. State of California et al
as 1:2019cv00743
Defendant:
Oracle, Hewlett Packard, Microsoft and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draper v. Google Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01299
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Draper
Defendant:
Google Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and Facebook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Microsoft et al
as 3:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Richard Ramirez
Defendant:
Microsoft, Apple, Viacom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
