Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PS) Expose v. US Bank National Association
as 2:2021cv01036
Plaintiff:
Linda Rose Expose
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, National Association and U.S. Bank Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudena James et al v. US Bancorp et al
as 5:2018cv01762
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Andy Cecere, US Bank National Association and others
Plaintiff:
Hedena James, Mercedes Green and Hudena James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Courtney Coombs et al v. RCO Legal, P.S. et al
as 8:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Courtney Coombs and Jeff Toland
Defendant:
Donna Yeowan Oh, RCO Legal, P.S. and US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association v. Marcos Melchor et al
as 5:2014cv01456
Defendant:
Does, Marcos Melchor, Teresa Melchor and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Edmund Smith v. Los Angeles County Superior Court et al
as 2:2013cv03308
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Superior Court, Judge Diana Summerhayes, Superior Court of State of California Appellate Division and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Smith
US Bank National Association v. Nazie Azam et al
as 8:2013cv00633
Defendant:
Nazie Azam and Does
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association v. Ryan Cloer et al
as 8:2011cv01433
Defendant:
Ryan Cloer and Does
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
US Bank National Association v. Abel Galvez et al
as 2:2011cv02160
Defendant:
Does and Abel Galvez
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Juan Camacho v. US Bank National Association et al
as 5:2009cv01266
Plaintiff:
Juan Camacho
Defendant:
US Bank National Association and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Civil Rights
Riley v. Countrywide Bank et al
as 3:2009cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dasha Riley
Defendant:
Countrywide Bank, Bank of New York, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
