Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Robinson et al v. Ardoin
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Press L Robinson, Sr, Edgar Cage, Dr. Dorothy Nairne and others
Defendant:
Kyle Ardoin
Not Yet Classified:
Edward Galmon, Sr., Ciara Hart, Norris Henderson and others
Petitioner:
State of Louisiana -Attorney General Jeff Landry, Louisiana Legislative Black Caucus and Vincent Pierre
Amicus Curiae:
Michael Mislove, Lisa J. Fauci, Robert Lipton and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Chairman LLBC Vincent Pierre
Intervenor Defendant:
Clay Schexnayder and Patrick Page Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Galmon et al v. Ardoin
as 3:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Edward Galmon, Sr., Ciara Hart, Norris Henderson and others
Defendant:
Kyle R Ardoin
Petitioner:
Clay Schexnayder, Patrick Page Cortez and State of Louisiana -Attorney General Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Galmon et al v. Ardoin
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Edward Galmon, Sr., Ciara Hart, Norris Henderson and others
Defendant:
Kyle R Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81823
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and NATIONAL REPUBLICATION SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021mc81824
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81824
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al
as 4:2021cv00201
Defendant:
LAUREL M LEE, CRAIG LATIMER, PENNY OGG and others
Plaintiff:
UNIDOSUS, Poder Latinx, HISPANIC FEDERATION and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. LEE et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, JULIE MARCUS, MELISSA ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRIGHAM, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC., CECILE SCOON and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. LEE
as 4:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant:
LAUREL M. LEE, LAUREL M LEE, KIM A BARTON and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Coalition on Black Civic Participation et al v. Wohl et al
as 1:2020cv08668
Plaintiff:
Mary Winter, Eda Daniel, National Coalition on Black Civic Participation and others
Defendant:
Jacob Wohl, J.M. Burkman & Associates, LLC, Project 1599 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
