Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dicks et al v. Hawaii Republican Party, et al et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks, James Ryan Malish and Daniel Decker
Defendant:
Hawaii Republican Party, et al, Shirlene Ostrov, Lynne Finnegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 18-4258
Petitioner / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR JOHN R. KASICH, In his official capacity, LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate, in his official capacity, JON HUSTED, Secretary of State of Ohio, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE OF OHIO and others
Intervenor:
STEVE CHABOT, et al
Mua v. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange et al
as 8:2016cv03267
Plaintiff:
Josephat Mua
Defendant:
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange et al., Marsden & Seledee, The O'Neal Firm, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Svc. Emp. Intl. Union, Local 1, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 15-3296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1005, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 863, OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JON HUSTED and STATE OF OHIO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. BURKE, et al
Mark Clayton v. Chip Forrester, et al
as 14-6525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK CLAYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIP FORRESTER and THE TENNESSEE DEMOCRATIC STATE PRIMARY BOARD, et al.
Svc Emp. Intl. Union, Local 1, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 14-4133
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1005 and others
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
JON HUSTED and STATE OF OHIO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. BURKE, et al.
Svc Emp. Intl. Union, Local 1, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 14-4084
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1005, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 863, OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE and others
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
JON HUSTED and STATE OF OHIO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. BURKE, et al
SEIU, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 12-4264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1005 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JON HUSTED
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. BURKE, et al.
Intervenor - Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO
Obama for America, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 12-4076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OBAMA FOR AMERICA, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Defendant:
JON HUSTED, et al.
Intervenor - Appellant:
NATIONAL GUARD ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES, ASSOCIATION OF THE U.S. NAVY, MARINE CORPS LEAGUE and others
Svc. Emp. Intl. Union, Local 1, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 12-4069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 863, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 880, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1059 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JON HUSTED
Amicus Curiae:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH, CITIZENS REFORM ASSOCIATION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OHIO
Defendant:
TIMOTHY M. BURKE, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
