Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, VOTERS OF TOMORROW ACTION, INC. and others
Defendant: CORD BYRD, ASHLEY MOODY, KIM BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Addoh-Kondi et al v. Jefferson County Commission,The et al
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff: Alexia Addoh-Kondi, Cynthia Bonner, Ja'Nelle Brown and others
Defendant: Jefferson County Commission,The, Steve Ammons, T. Joe Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff: VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Residents and Occupants of Green Mountain Mobile Manor et al v. Town of Fair Haven, Vermont et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff: Residents and Occupants of Green Mountain Mobile Manor, Tammy Dominguez, Charles Pope and others
Defendant: Town of Fair Haven, Vermont, Joseph Gunter, Christopher Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Washington Election Integrity Coalition United et al v. Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05787
Plaintiff: Washington Election Integrity Coalition United, Tamborine Borrelli, Mary Rose Wiedrich and others
Defendant: Mary Hall, Thurston County and Does 1-30
Intervenor: Washington State Democratic Central Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81823
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee and NATIONAL REPUBLICATION SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021mc81824
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant: The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81824
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant: The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00201
Defendant: LAUREL M LEE, CRAIG LATIMER, PENNY OGG and others
Plaintiff: UNIDOSUS, Poder Latinx, HISPANIC FEDERATION and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. LEE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00186
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY, JULIE MARCUS, MELISSA ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT BRIGHAM, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC., CECILE SCOON and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?