Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Disability Rights MS v. Fitch
as 23-60463
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Disability Rights Mississippi, League of Women Voters of Mississippi, William Earl Whitley and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Michael D. Watson, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Mississippi
Thompson et al v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi et al THREE JUDGE PANEL: REEVES, GRAVES, JORDAN
as 3:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
Rickey Thompson and Rencie Fells
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi , Lee County Democratic Party Executive Committee and Lee County Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tallahatchie Cty MS Br NAACP, et al v. Tallahatchie Cty MS Bd of Supr, et al
as 11-60676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP and JOHNNY THOMAS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Appellant:
DOROTHY CHESTNUT
Defendant - Appellee:
TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
JIM HOOD, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, ex
Tunica County, MS Branch NAACP, et al v. Tunica County, MS Bd of Supr, et al
as 11-60674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP and MARILYN YOUNG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
JIM HOOD, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee:
TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Tunica County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Tunica County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Tunica County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Marilyn Young
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Tunica County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Tunica County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desoto County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Desoto County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Desoto County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Thomas Plunkett
Defendant:
Desoto County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Desoto County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Desoto County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tallahatchie County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Tallahatchie County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tallahatchie County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Johnny Thomas
Defendant:
Tallahatchie County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Tallahatchie County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Tallahatchie County, Mississippi Republican party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earl Tucker, et al v. Delbert Hosemann, et al
as 10-60859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL TUCKER and ARRECE WEBB, Individually and on behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT HOSEMANN, Secretary of State for the State of Mississippi, JIM HOOD, Attorney General Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, combined and in their capacity and STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, Individually as well as in their Representative Capacity and all others Simularly Situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
