Cases 131 - 140 of 280
Melo v. Pasquale Family Limited Partnership I
as 1:2013cv11158
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramon Melo
Defendant:
Pasquale Family Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marshall v. 100 City Hall Plaza
as 1:2013cv11123
Plaintiff:
John Marshall
Defendant:
100 City Hall Plaza Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marshall v. Dunbo's, LLC
as 1:2013cv11125
Plaintiff:
John Marshall
Defendant:
Dunbo's, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Melo v. Prince Street Realty Trust et al
as 1:2013cv11120
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramon Melo
Defendant:
Prince Street Realty Trust, Carolyn Cucinatti, Floreen A. Cucinatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Jutkiewicz v. Roldan
as 1:2013cv10998
Plaintiff:
Karen Jutkiewicz
Defendant:
Wanda Roldan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Melo v. Neptune Oyster, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv10945
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramon Melo
Defendant:
Neptune Oyster, LLC and Bostonian LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marradi v. Canzano et al
as 1:2013cv10813
Plaintiff:
Raoul Marradi
Defendant:
Joan Canzano, Galway House, Inc. and Seven 02 Realty Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marradi v. Five-53 Boylston St Ptnrs et al
as 1:2013cv10815
Plaintiff:
Raoul Marradi
Defendant:
Five-53 Boylston St Ptnrs and Burger King Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marradi v. Five-53 Boylston St Ptnrs et al
as 1:2013cv10814
Plaintiff:
Raoul Marradi
Defendant:
Five-53 Boylston St Ptnrs and Wendy's International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marshall v. Mall at Auburn, LLC
as 1:2011cv11638
Plaintiff:
John Marshall
Defendant:
Mall at Auburn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
