Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 633
Campbell Union High School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03224
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Campbell Union High School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Downey Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04279
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Downey Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Glendale Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04264
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Glendale Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scotts Valley Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04269
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Scotts Valley Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
El Dorado Union High School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04170
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff: El Dorado Union High School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Castro Valley Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Castro Valley Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Campbell Union High School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04188
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Campbell Union High School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Winston County, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 6:2022cv01394
Plaintiff: Winston County, Alabama
Defendant: Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tri Huynh v. Walmart, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16188
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRI MINH HUYNH
Defendant / Appellee: WALMART, INC., A Delaware corporation, DOUG MCMILLON, BRETT BIGGS and others
Defendant: WAL-MART.COM USA LLC, RACHEL BRAND, GREGORY B. PENNER and others
City of Sarasota v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2022op45021
Plaintiff: City of Sarasota
Defendant: Walgreen Co., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?