Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Patrick Joseph Soria et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant: George Wesley Pierce, Jr., Rebekah Brown, Westwood Legal and others
Plaintiff: Nationstar Mortgage LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for The Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF10 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF10
Receiver: Robb Evans & Associates LLC, Temporary Receiver and Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Interested Party: Robert West, Morgan Picks Two LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee Formerly Known as Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee, or its Permitted Successors and Assig and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Marina Ivanoff
Intervenor: Selene Finance, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Select Portfolio Services, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant: All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in The Subject Property Located at 390 South Sepulveda Boulevard Unit 208, Los Angeles, California 90049, APN, Kimberly L Yamada-Tung, Christina Gifford and others
Petitioner: Garson Silvers, DNE Associates, a CA general partnership, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWMBS, Inc CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-HYB4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HYB4 and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Century 21 Citrus Realty and Albert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert D. Brenizer et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv03057
Plaintiff: Sape Llanos, Wilford Vernon David, Tex Cody Horn and others
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive and FCA U.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bianey Aguayo, Jr. v. Gilberts El Indio et al
as 2:2021cv03399
Plaintiff: Bianey Aguayo, Jr.
Defendant: Gilbert's El Indio, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,, Gilberts El Indio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patel et al v. Sicre et al
as 5:2021cv00758
Plaintiff: Dipak Patel and Shalu Corporation
Defendant: Does 1 through 10 Inclusive and Sylvia Sicre
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Roque Santi et al v. Tania Elissia Batache et al
as 2:2021cv00603
Plaintiff: Mafalda Fontana and Roque Santi
Defendant: All Unknown Occupants, Tenants and Subtenants, Tania Elissia Batache and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Travis Middleton v. The California Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2020cv10935
Defendant: Kelvin Wilkins, Jane Doe Stephanie, Angie Baez and others
Plaintiff: Travis Middleton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Malgesini v. Malley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv07002
Defendant: Gregory Malley and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE
Plaintiff: Thomas Malgesini
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Skye Orthobiologics, LLC et al v. CTM Biomedical, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03444
Defendant: Mike Stumpe, CTM Biomedical, LLC, Gardner Rogers and others
Plaintiff: Human Regenerative Technologies, LLC and Skye Orthobiologics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Exclusive Beauty Club, LLC v. Rymax Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv04677
Defendant: Rymax Corp, Brainstorm Logistics, LLC, Jessica Brown and others
Plaintiff: Exlusive Beauty Club, LLC and Exclusive Beauty Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diana Solorio v. Sempris, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05473
Plaintiff: Diana Solorio
Defendant: Sempris, LLC, Doe Defendants 1-10, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?