Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Lavin et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv02440
Plaintiff:
Richard Lavin, Richard Lavin, Simmie Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporation, Keith Orlin Crump and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jose Luis Pedroza et al v. Countrywide Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv04371
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Pedroza, Jose Luis Pedroza, Maria G. Gomez-Pedroza and others
Defendant:
Countrywide Bank, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., CTC Real Estate Services and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Deperio v. First Federal Bank of California, et al
as 3:2009cv00731
Plaintiff:
Edward P. Deperio, Jorly P. Rapada, Allan R. Camba and others
Defendant:
First Federal Bank of California, Firstfed Financial Corp., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gorozhankin v. Klebener et al
as 3:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Vyacheslav Gorozhankin
Defendant:
Samuel Klebener, Mariya Gofman and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kauhi et al v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc et al
as 3:2008cv05580
Plaintiff:
Jameson Kealii Kauhi and Ramona Carmelle Kauhi
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans Inc, Bank of America Corporation, Countrywide Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
William A Masters II v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 2:2008cv01390
Plaintiff:
William A Masters, II
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Biola University, Inc. v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv04917
Plaintiff:
Biola University, Inc., Biola University, Inc. and Biola University, Inc.
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, -, Banc of America Securities, LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
