Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 121
GolTV, Inc. et al v. Fox Sports Latin America Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv24431
Plaintiff: GolTV, Inc, GolTV, Inc. and Global Sports Partners LLP
Defendant: Fox Sports Latin America Ltd, Fox Sports Latin America Ltd., Pan American Sports Enterprises Company individually and as successor to Fox Pan American Sports LLC doing business as Fox Sports Latin America Ltd. and others
Intervenor: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Telford et al v. United States of America et al DO NOT DOCKET FURTHER PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO ORDER 7 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03147
Defendant: Susan Aukema, Lea Bonnecaze, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: Steven Fritts and Hollie Telford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The Estate of Alfred Rappaport, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-13211
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE ESTATE OF ALFRED RAPPAPORT, Deceased, by and through Personal Representative and Executrix Lori Rappaport LaCroix, on behalf of the LaCroix Beneficiaries, LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, Co-Executrix and TRUST U/W/O ALFRED RAPPAPORT, by and through Trustee Lori Rappaport LaCroix on behalf of the La Croix Beneficiaries
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF FLORIDA and others
The Estate of Alfred Rappaport, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-12942
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE ESTATE OF ALFRED RAPPAPORT, Deceased, by and through Personal Representative and Executrix Lori Rappaport LaCroix, on behalf of the LaCroix Beneficiaries, LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, Co-Executrix, TRUST U/W/O ALFRED RAPPAPORT, by and through Trustee Lori Rappaport LaCroix on behalf of the LaCroix Beneficiaries and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Estate of Alfred Rappaport
as 0:2016cv60885
Plaintiff: The Estate of Alfred Rappaport, Lori Rappaport LaCroix, Trust U/W/O Alfred Rappaport and others
Defendant: The United States of America, The State of Indiana, The State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
William Evans, Jr. v. Scioto County Common Pleas Co, et al
as 15-4369
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: SCIOTO COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT AND JUDGES OF GENERAL, DOMESTIC & PROBATE DIVISIONS, FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO AND JUDGES, OHIO COURT OF CLAIMS AND JUDGES and others
Janis Kaighn et al v. Richard Cheney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv08339
Defendant: Richard B Cheney, Carolyn Colvin, County of Sacramento and others
Plaintiff: Greg Kaighn and Janis Kaighn
Price et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv04631
Plaintiff: Jenetta L. Price and Scott Robinson
Defendant: United States of America, State of California, Contra Costa County CA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephen Yagman v. Joseph Curtis Edmondson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv07210
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Michael J. Colello
Counter Claimant: Michael J. Colello
Defendant: Michael J. Colello, Joseph Curtis Edmondson and Ten Unknown Named Defendants
ThirdParty Defendant: United States of America
Movant: United States of America
Counter Defendant: Stephen Yagman
Plaintiff: Stephen Yagman
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Daniel Capen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv01279
Defendant: Ahmed Pomona Medical Group, Inc., MD John Larsen, Westlake Surgical Medical Associates, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Gerald Alexander, United States of America, Katherine Bowles and others
Plaintiff: State Compensation Insurance Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?