Cases 1 - 4 of 4
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO.68 AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUNDS et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. et al
as 3:2007cv02313
Plaintiff:
IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO.68 AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUNDS, IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO.399 AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUNDS and IRONWORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY BENEFIT AND PENSION PLAN
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., ASTRAZENECA, L.P., ASTRAZENECA PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10879
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02777
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
