Cases 1 - 5 of 5
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. Punjwani et al
as 4:2019cv01491
Defendant:
Sohail B. Roopani, Anil B. Roopani, Pain Alleviation & Interventional Needs, LLC n/k/a Pain Alleviation & Interventional Needs, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
State Farm County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Elite Health Services Sugar Land, Medical Center Healthcare Services, L.P., d/b/a Elite Health Services Medical Center and Clay Healthcare Services, LLC, d/b/a Elite Health Services West Houston
Respondent:
The Law Office of Hilda L. Sibrian, P.C., Clay Healthcare Services LLC, Medical Center Healthcare Services LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Investor Land Services, LLC, et al v. Horizon Communities Improvement Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Mathew Bell, Butterfield Land Investments, LLC, Kenny T. Duong and others
Defendant:
Jacob T. Bojorquez, Christopher Bustillos, David R. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KUHN et al v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv00059
Defendant:
AAC QUAD-C INVESTORS, LLC, ASSET ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL CORP., ASSET ACCEPTANCE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAUN BOOKER, MYCHELLE CASEL, CATHERINE KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adams et al v. Rothstein et al
as 0:2011cv61688
Plaintiff:
Amy Adams , Frank Adams , Scott Adams and others
Defendant:
Scott W. Rothstein, TD Bank, N.A. and Gibraltar Private Bank and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Atkins et al v. Apollo Real Estate Advisors L.P. et al
as 1:2005cv04365
Plaintiff:
Janet B. Ruben, David T. Atkins, Anthony A. Abbazio and others
Defendant:
Apollo Real Estate Advisors L.P., Winthrop Financial Associates, GFB-AS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
