Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United Brotherhood of Carpente, et al v. Building and Contruction Trade, et al
as 12-36049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, SOUTHWEST CARPENTERS JATC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BUILDING AND CONTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT, ED HILL, JAMES WILLIAMS and others
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al v. Building and Construction Trades Department et al
as 2:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America , Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters , Southwest Carpenters JATC and others
Defendant:
Building and Construction Trades Department , Mark Ayers , Ed Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Makowski v. United Brotherhood of Carpent
as 10-3719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Makowski
Defendant:
Ahern Painting Contractors, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 157 of District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
Continental Finance Corporation et al v. Ledwith et al
as 1:2008cv07272
Plaintiff:
Continental Finance Corporation and James Murphy
Defendant:
Robert Ledwith, Andres Puerta, Terry Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Makowski v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al
as 1:2008cv06150
Plaintiff:
Robert Makowski
Defendant:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
