Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,632
PERRYMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00892
Petitioner: MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dismukes v. USA
as 3:2023cv00414
Petitioner: Terrell Dismukes
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GAYDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00825
Petitioner: JENSEN DANTRELL GAYDEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burns v. USA
as 3:2023cv00393
Petitioner: Bradley Burns
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
OWENS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00762
Petitioner: DERRICK OWENS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Farmer v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00151
Petitioner: Jeremiah Shane Farmer
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Love v. USA
as 2:2023cv00149
Petitioner: Bryant Love
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KRAMER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00755
Petitioner: JEFFREY KRAMER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Turner v. USA
as 3:2023cv00343
Petitioner: Darrell Turner
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Foxx v. USA
as 2:2023cv00147
Petitioner: Latonya R. Foxx
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?