Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,932
Duke v. USA
as 4:2023cv11538
Petitioner: Ronnie Edward Duke
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00657
Petitioner: Maurice Schanta Carson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Welch v. USA
as 1:2023cv11519
Petitioner: Koryion Deshawn Welch
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Atkins v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00652
Petitioner: Christopher Joseph Atkins
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drozdowski v. USA
as 2:2023cv11415
Petitioner: David Randy Drozdowski
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Castano v. USA
as 2:2023cv11378
Petitioner: Victor Carlos Castano
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Castano v. USA
as 2:2023cv11377
Petitioner: Victor Carlos Castano
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv11352
Petitioner: Jeff Garvin Smith
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rich v. USA
as 2:2023cv11285
Petitioner: Michael Kenneth Rich
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cox v. USA
as 2:2023cv11288
Petitioner: Antoine Devon Cox
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?