Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
HORNE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01997
Petitioner: DEWAN ANTHONY HORNE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BAILEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01718
Petitioner: ANTHONY TYRONE BAILEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HORNE v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01629
Petitioner: DEWAN ANTHONY HORNE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BAILEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01662
Petitioner: ANTHONY TYRONE BAILEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gibson v. USA
as 2:2016cv00279
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Anthony D Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RAUPP v. USA
as 1:2016cv01583
Petitioner: ANTHONY RAUPP
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HARRELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01602
Petitioner: ANTHONY HARRELL, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HARRELL v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01528
Petitioner: ANTHONY HARRELL, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00271
Petitioner: ANTHONY RUTLEDGE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bandy v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00278
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Anthony Jerome Bandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?