Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,632
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner: OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner: SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner: Cornelius J Jackson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BYRNE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00431
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER C. BYRNE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KIRBY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00500
Petitioner: CHARLES KIRBY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCCLINTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner: DAYONTA MCCLINTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Placencia v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner: Michael L Placencia
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drake v. USA
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner: Jalen S Drake
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner: JALEN DAVIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RODGERS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00539
Petitioner: ROBERT RODGERS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?