Cases 31 - 40 of 2,502
Gajadhar v. USA
as 1:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Randy Gajadhar
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dillard v. USA
as 2:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Darick Dewayne Dillard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Dale Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gissendanner v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08043
Petitioner:
Tavara Japree Gissendanner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bradley v. USA
as 1:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Harlan Bradley, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hutchins v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08042
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Hutchins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bean v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08041
Petitioner:
Brandon Martel Bean
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McKenzie v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Lewis McKenzie
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00460
Petitioner:
Gilberto Gonzalez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
