Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Wolfenbarger v. USA
as 5:2024cv01592
Petitioner: John Wolfenbarger
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff: Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant: United States of America, Otis D. Wright II, Stephen V. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Franklin Friedlander v. Jacob Doerer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv01603
Petitioner: John Franklin Friedlander
Respondent: Jacob Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Anthony Terrones v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01947
Petitioner: John Anthony Terrones
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
John Ernest Dade v. Bryan Birkholz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05907
Petitioner: John Ernest Dade
Respondent: Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vinoya v. USA
as 4:2022cv04773
Petitioner: John Vicencio Vinoya
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Jingles v. USA (2255- 2:98-cr-0431 KJM)
as 2:2021cv02008
Petitioner: John Wesley Jingles
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniels v. USA
as 4:2019cv05539
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Devalier Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee v. USA
as 3:2018cv06223
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Ching En Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(HC) Harris v. USA (2255- 12-CR-326 MCE)
as 2:2018cv02353
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Winton Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?