Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00451
Petitioner: Edward Eugene Robinson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ausbie v. USA
as 1:2023cv00203
Petitioner: Dijuan Edward Ausbie
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jacobs v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00445
Petitioner: Edward Todd Jacobs
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Bearden v. USA
as 4:2022cv00896
Petitioner: Wayne Edward Bearden
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Bearden v. USA
as 4:2022cv00895
Petitioner: Wayne Edward Bearden
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Terry v. USA
as 6:2022cv01009
Plaintiff: Clarence Edward Terry, Jr.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Turner v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00765
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Turner, III
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guerra v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00407
Plaintiff: Robert Edward Guerra
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Terrell v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2022cv00354
Plaintiff: John Ray Edward Terrell
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Christofferson v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00064
Plaintiff: Otto Edward Christofferson
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?