Cases 1 - 10 of 1,341
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Khalil M Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
DUJUAN LUCAS and DEJUAN LUCAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner:
Dewayne Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
Eugene Dawson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Torrence Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Cornelius J Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Placencia v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Michael L Placencia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
