Cases 91 - 100 of 4,753
Dennis Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40605
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS RAY FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Loften v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10505
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ERIC LOFTEN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Daniel Harris v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20257
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rivera v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01116
Petitioner:
Juan William Rivera
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cavazos v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00511
Petitioner:
Ramon Cavazos, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01114
Petitioner:
Eugene Hart
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alfred Henderson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20256
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFRED HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Larry Watson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50417
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY G. WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Carl Latino, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40596
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL THOMAS LATINO, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ochoa v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01127
Petitioner:
Esequiel Ochoa
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
