Cases 101 - 110 of 2,107
Schiff v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03332
Petitioner:
Graham Schiff
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holeman v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
Earl Holeman
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Darden et al
as 1:2022cv03149
Petitioner:
Adrian Francis Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Debora Darden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaney v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03319
Petitioner:
Keith Chaney
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 1:2022cv03340
Petitioner:
Lorence F Smith, II
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mansaray v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Mohamed Mansaray
Respondent:
Robert Dean and The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Warden of MCTC
as 1:2022cv03135
Petitioner:
Thomas Woods
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorham v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03233
Petitioner:
Antonio Gorham
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
Jamal Chapman
Defendant:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson, Jr. v. Werner et al
as 1:2022cv03118
Petitioner:
Dyron Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General, Gregory A. Werner and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
