Cases 101 - 110 of 567
Ream v. Gibson
as 2:2019cv00923
Respondent:
Dianna Gibson
Not Yet Classified:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Guy A. Ream
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Skanchy
as 2:2019cv00955
Respondent:
Randall N. Skanchy
Petitioner:
Ronald Joseph Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spencer v. Smith
as 2:2019cv00642
Not Yet Classified:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Dean Marshal Spencer
Respondent:
Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hood v. Skanchy
as 2:2019cv00622
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Howard Hood
Defendant:
Randall Skanchy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Balfour v. Nelson
as 2:2019cv00640
Not Yet Classified:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Ozwald Balfour
Respondent:
A. Shane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Todd v. Haddon
as 2:2019cv00700
Respondent:
Mike Haddon
Petitioner:
Shayne E. Todd
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finlayson v. State of Utah
as 2:2019cv00599
Respondent:
State of Utah
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Jeffery Russell Finlayson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Salt Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv00490
Petitioner:
Dallin Hawkins
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, Salt Lake County Jail and Salt Lake County Adult Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberts v. Curtis
as 4:2019cv00063
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Respondent:
Nathan Curtis
Petitioner:
Mark Jess Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ringstad v. Sparks
as 1:2019cv00090
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Parnell Ringstad
Respondent:
Kelly Sparks
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
