Cases 101 - 110 of 4,252
Dammarell v. Coyote Ridge et al
as 1:2023cv03175
Petitioner:
Travis Lee Dammarell
Respondent:
Coyote Ridge, Benton County and Yakima County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cantu v. State of Washington
as 1:2023cv03162
Petitioner:
Ismael Cantu, Sr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morisette v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv01519
Petitioner:
Christopher Morisette
Respondent:
State of Washington and Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faustino-Anaya v. State of Washington
as 4:2023cv05153
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lei v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Wobiao Lei
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Andrewjeski et al
as 3:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peter Joseph Rowe
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garver v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv01429
Petitioner:
Anthony Garver
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parviz v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Petitioner:
Mahsa Parviz
Respondent:
H Barron and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Basra v. Keenan et al
as 2:2023cv01561
Petitioner:
Paramjit Singh Basra
Respondent:
David Keenan and Donald Raz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
