General Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,116
Bell v. State of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03381
Petitioner: Kent Bell
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaney v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03319
Petitioner: Keith Chaney
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03340
Petitioner: Lorence F Smith, II
Respondent: Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Dean
as 1:2022cv03343
Petitioner: Antoine Sheldon Davis
Respondent: Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holeman v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff: Earl Holeman
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilder v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03264
Petitioner: Lawrence V. Wilder
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorham v. State of Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03233
Petitioner: Antonio Gorham
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff: Jamal Chapman
Defendant: Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Darden
as 1:2022cv03137
Petitioner: Lamont Banks, Jr.
Respondent: Debora Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Darden et al
as 1:2022cv03149
Petitioner: Adrian Francis Lewis
Respondent: Warden Debora Darden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?