Cases 121 - 130 of 11,583
Frazier v. Odum
as 4:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
James A. Frazier
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glass v. USP Victorville
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. McFarlin
as 4:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paschal v. Augusta State Medical Prison
as 1:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
Charles A. Paschal, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMILEY v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01259
Petitioner:
James E. Lackey
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins and Screven County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obeginski v. Walker
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
