Cases 121 - 130 of 11,883
Malloch v. Indiana Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Steven E Malloch
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Jeffery Buckley
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NUNLEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
WALTER J. NUNLEY
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, BRADLEY HAMMOND, ROBERT ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
RENALD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael J Cochran, Sr and Michael Cochran, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWMAN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
TORRI E. NEWMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IRVING v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
DEJON IRVING
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
