Cases 131 - 140 of 11,883
Simbeck v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAUDENBUSH v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
BRAD RAUDENBUSH
Respondent:
C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
LAKESHA MITCHELL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KREILEIN v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
RAYMOND C. WHITE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Torrence Belcher
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
RENALD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL
as 1:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
KENDALL JOHNSON
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANCE v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
DESHALON FRANCE
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Rogers
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
