Cases 141 - 150 of 6,306
West v. Butler
as 3:2023cv01354
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne West
Respondent:
Jason Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luna v. Warden
as 7:2023cv01345
Petitioner:
Erika Ramirez Luna
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01346
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2023cv01317
Petitioner:
David "Otto" Jacobson and David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W. Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Standfield v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Timothy Bryan Standfield
Respondent:
Asst Warden Joesph Headley and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Edwards
as 4:2023cv01321
Petitioner:
David Leroy Cox, Jr
Respondent:
George Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodson v. Morgan (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Andre Goodson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. Horton
as 4:2023cv01309
Petitioner:
Richard L Ramsey
Respondent:
Sheriff Jonathon W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carden v. Howell et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Michael Howell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baggott v. Cohen (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Robert Baggott
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
