Cases 141 - 150 of 11,883
KREILEIN v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEVON ROBINSON, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Simbeck v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WETHINGTON v. DAVIS
as 4:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
LINDSAY WETHINGTON
Respondent:
JAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson, III v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Indiana Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPICER v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
HARRY SPICER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peacher v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01106
Petitioner:
Robert Peacher and R Peacher
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARD v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
TORY D. WARD
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANCELLOR v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY CHANCELLOR
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
