Cases 151 - 160 of 2,615
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv10999
Petitioner:
Clarke Phillips
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stovall v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv10954
Petitioner:
Carl Theodore Stovall, III
Respondent:
A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Huang v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10903
Petitioner:
Da Lin Huang
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves and Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. Alves
as 3:2022cv30074
Petitioner:
Kevin S Francis
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanson v. Bridgewater State Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv10898
Petitioner:
Carl Swanson
Respondent:
Bridgewater State Hospital and Judges of the Brockton District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10806
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Dolan et al
as 1:2022cv10771
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Watson
Defendant:
Edward Dolan
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv10758
Petitioner:
Timi Y. Wallace
Respondent:
William Scott Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freiberg v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10751
Petitioner:
Richard S Freiberg
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves and Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10746
Petitioner:
Elias Sanchez
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
