Cases 151 - 160 of 4,806
Mays v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Petitioner:
James Mays, III
Defendant:
Collette Peters
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Somerville v. Holloway
as 2:2023cv02445
Petitioner:
Jesse J. Somerville
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Drew v. Trate
as 2:2023cv02494
Petitioner:
Robert Drew
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Steed v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00816
Petitioner:
Reginold C. Steed
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dodson v. Rhoades
as 3:2023cv00754
Petitioner:
Christopher James Dodson
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips
Respondent:
Sheriff Dusty Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Bryant J Harris
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Claxton v. Pounds
as 2:2023cv02553
Petitioner:
Darryl Claxton
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
