Cases 161 - 170 of 11,583
Lee v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Sung Min Lee
Respondent:
U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Danforth
as 4:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden Danforth
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Lewis
Respondent:
Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrum v. Henry County Law Officials
as 1:2024cv00256
Petitioner:
Willie M Goodrum
Respondent:
Henry County Law Officials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardaway v. Pineiro
as 1:2024cv00334
Petitioner:
Kevin E. Hardaway
Respondent:
Aaron Pineiro and Coastal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gillis
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
Antonio L. Williams
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAN v. AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
as 3:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
SALEEVAN ADAN
Respondent:
AMERICAN WHITE GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Coffee Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Evans, III
Respondent:
Coffee Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crouch v. Jessup
as 2:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Edward Jasper Crouch
Respondent:
Stephen Jessup
Other:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
