Cases 161 - 170 of 1,649
Pendleton v. Clarinda Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Devin Pendleton
Respondent:
Clarinda Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. State of Iowa
as 4:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Kevin Rashuan Lee
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hews v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
John Hosea Hews, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soper v. Heinricy
as 4:2022cv00177
Petitioner:
Joshua A. Soper
Respondent:
Mike Heinricy
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
James Bell, III
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carr v. State of Iowa
as 4:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
Jimmy Jacoby Carr
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik and Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dudley v. Lamb
as 3:2022cv03014
Petitioner:
McKinley Dudley, Jr
Respondent:
Nicholas Lamb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohamed v. Woodbury District Court
as 5:2022cv04028
Petitioner:
Ismail A Mohamed
Respondent:
Woodbury District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Johnson and Scott County District Court
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purvis v. State of Iowa
as 3:2022cv03010
Petitioner:
Warren Purvis
Respondent:
Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
