Cases 171 - 180 of 6,810
Cobble v. Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield
as 6:2023cv04039
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble and Johnathan Wayne Plemons
Defendant:
Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield and Warden Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whaley v. Gallam
as 4:2023cv04590
Petitioner:
James C. Whaley and James Carl Whaley
Respondent:
Detention Captain Nick Gallam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeno v. Gallam et al
as 2:2023cv03907
Petitioner:
Keith E. Jeno
Respondent:
Nick Gallam and The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 1:2023cv03920
Petitioner:
Sherman Carnell Gay
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
as 8:2023cv04175
Petitioner:
Wendall Moore
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Joseph
as 1:2023cv04009
Petitioner:
Maurice L. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hinson v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2023cv03906
Petitioner:
Jamaal Hinson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. SCDC et al
as 9:2023cv03657
Petitioner:
Trey C. Brown
Respondent:
SCDC, Warden Nelson and Lieutenant Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeno v. Gallam
as 2:2023cv04692
Petitioner:
Keith E. Jeno
Respondent:
Nick Gallam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Cureton v. Bodiford
as 9:2023cv03568
Petitioner:
Nathan Orlando Cureton
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
