Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 1:2020cv02231
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raker v. Coleman et al
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent:
Jackie Fulford, Timothy Carr, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Dustin H. Raker
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSS v. JEFFERSON et al
as 1:2020cv01683
Defendant:
REPORTING OFFICER DAVID H WHITE, Dr. Wilcox, WARDEN TRACEY JEFFERSON and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01705
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
B. Stirling, R. B. Harwell, S. C. Admin. Law Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv01706
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
Beth Drake, U.S.D.C.-Dist. of So. Car. Divs., H. D. McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EL v. OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 5:2019cv00504
Respondent:
CYNTHIA H CLANTON and OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
Petitioner:
TEZ BEN EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richards v. Johns et al
as 5:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Tracy Johns and Hon. William H. Barr
Petitioner:
Barrington Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HILLSMAN v. BAILEY et al
as 3:2019cv00037
Plaintiff:
RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN H BAILEY, JR and JIMMY WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hemphill v. Toby et al
as 1:2018cv05885
Petitioner:
Willie James Hemphill
Respondent:
Annettia Toby, Elizabeth H. Brock and Warden Artis Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawes v. Bryson et al
as 6:2018cv00131
Petitioner:
James H. Hawes
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Homer Bryson and Terry E. Barnard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
