General Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
JENKINS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv00223
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner: ROBERT JENKINS
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02040
Petitioner: ALAN W. JENKINS
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. BROWN
as 2:2013cv00132
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: JAMES JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. BROWN
as 2:2012cv00287
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: JAMES JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. BROWN
as 2:2012cv00288
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: JAMES JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. BROWN
as 2:2012cv00289
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: JAMES JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. BASINGER
as 2:2010cv00214
Respondent: JAMES BASINGER
Petitioner: FRANK JENKINS, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. FINNAN
as 1:2010cv00887
Supt. PCF: ALAN FINNAN
Petitioner: NATHAN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Superintendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00141
Petitioner: Ronald L Jenkins
Respondent: Superintendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. FINNAN
as 2:2008cv00116
Petitioner: KEITH JENKINS
Respondent: ALAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?