Cases 11 - 20 of 2,780
Lindsey v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv02290
Petitioner:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
David James Cook, SR
Respondent:
Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gallop v. Segal
as 0:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Teresa Gallop
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Felix-Razo v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02186
Petitioner:
Alexis Felix-Razo
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fortner v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01496
Petitioner:
Anthony Fortner
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bulchaa v. Rish et al
as 0:2024cv02069
Petitioner:
Moosisaa Dhugumaa Bulchaa
Respondent:
Krish Rish and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdikarim v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv02013
Petitioner:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Respondent:
State of Minnesota, Ottertail County States Attorney, Cass County Jail ND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beadle v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02045
Petitioner:
Jack Eugene Beadle
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
