Cases 11 - 20 of 26
McDowell v. Zavaras
as 1:2010cv02150
Petitioner:
Charles William McDowell
Respondent:
Aristedes W. Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winkler v. People of the State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2010cv02124
Petitioner:
Shawn Mandel Winkler
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The and Aristedes W. Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler v. Jones et al
as 1:2010cv02054
Petitioner:
Ray E. Butler
Respondent:
Susan Jones and Aristedes W. Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pavlov v. Ritter et al
as 1:2010cv01723
Petitioner:
Stanimir Georgiev Pavlov
Respondent:
Bill Ritter, Aristedes W. Zavaras, Smelzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quevedo v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv01667
Petitioner:
Reinhald O. Quevedo
Respondent:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Susan Jones and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Challenor v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv01151
Petitioner:
Peter Michael Challenor
Respondent:
Aristedes W. Zavaras and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brim v. Zavaras, et al
as 09-1516
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST BRIM, AKA Bernard Horne
Respondent - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Colorado "DOC" Executive Director and JOHN SUTHERS, Esq., the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Stein v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02389
Petitioner:
Michael D. Stein
Respondent:
Aristedes W. Zavaras and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02067
Petitioner:
Alphonso Jay William
Respondent:
Aristedes W. Zavaras and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02008
Petitioner:
David James Hanson
Respondent:
Aristedes W. Zavaras and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
