Cases 11 - 20 of 1,499
(HC) Curry v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00956
Petitioner:
David Henry Curry
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Madding v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Michael David Madding
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Aguilar v. Matteson
as 2:2024cv00292
Petitioner:
David Trujillo Aguilar
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bennett v. Yolo County Superior Court
as 2:2023cv02885
Petitioner:
David Hill Bennett and David Bennett
Respondent:
Yolo County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew David Herrera v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 8:2023cv02327
Petitioner:
Matthew David Herrera
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) LaTour v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv02791
Petitioner:
Cory David LaTour
Respondent:
Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gamboa v. Department of Human Services Child Services
as 1:2023cv01647
Petitioner:
David Gamboa
Respondent:
Department of Human Services Child Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerome Dean Eads v. David Holbrook
as 5:2023cv02379
Petitioner:
Jerome Dean Eads
Respondent:
David Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Ramirez v. Aguilar et al
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Narciso Ramirez
Respondent:
Mark S. Aguilar, Judge David Wolf, Judge Eric Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David James Krause v. C.M.F.
as 2:2023cv08744
Petitioner:
David James Krause
Respondent:
CMF Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
