Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Jose Heredia v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 11-15753
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO HEREDIA
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
O'Kelley v. Heredia, et al
as 11-2175
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY RAY O'KELLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE HEREDIA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Heredia v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv01721
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Heredia
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jorge Heredia v. Vincent Cullen
as 11-55774
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE C. HEREDIA
Respondent - Appellee:
VINCENT CULLEN, Warden
Ayala-Heredia v. US Marshals Executive Office et al
as 1:2011cv01072
Petitioner:
Luis Ayala-Heredia
Respondent:
Executive I.C.E., Prosecutor for City of Kansas, MO, Warden Duke Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heredia v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00211
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Heredia
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jorge Campos Heredia v. Vincent Cullen
as 2:2011cv00431
Respondent:
Vincent Cullen
Petitioner:
Jorge Campos Heredia
Lara v. Heredia et al
as 2:2010cv01035
Petitioner:
Hector Lara
Respondent:
Mike Heredia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lara v. Heredia et al
as 1:2010cv01035
Petitioner:
Hector Lara
Respondent:
Mike Heredia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orvis v. Heredia, et al
as 10-2180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH HILLS ORVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE A. HEREDIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
