Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Seavon Pierce v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 15-5058
Petitioner - Appellant:
Seavon Pierce
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Barack Hussein Obama, United States of America and others
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5039
Petitioner - Appellant:
Seavon Pierce
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, Pierce V. Gonzalez, United States of America and others
PIERCE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIERCE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, PIERCE V. GONZALEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIERCE v. HARRIS, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, U.S. GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pierce v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv01992
Petitioner:
Seavon Pierce
Respondent:
Barack Obama, United States Government, California Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seavon Pierce v. Barak Obama et al
as 5:2014cv01003
Respondent:
Fernando Gonzales, Attorney general Kamala D Harris, Internal Affairs and others
Petitioner:
Seavon Pierce
Pierce et al v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Seavou Pierce, California Prisoners and U.S. Prisoners
Defendant:
Barack Obama, United States, Fernando Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama et al
as 5:2013cv02213
Defendant:
Fernando Gonzales
Respondent:
Kamala D Harris, Internal Affairs, Barack Obama and others
Petitioner:
Seavon Pierce
James Murray v. BOP, et al
as 13-1108
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY, also known as JAMES HINES
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES INSPECTOR GENERAL and SAMUEL SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
