Cases 11 - 20 of 322
STILES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv05977
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
RAFIK STILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv01823
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Superintendent and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Barton Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOND v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04084
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and JAMIE SORBER
Petitioner:
JESSE BOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOODY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv03258
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
BRANDON N. MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Housman v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv01198
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Michael Zaken and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
William Housman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolfe v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv01153
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, PA State Attorney General, Capt. K Kauffman and others
Petitioner:
James A Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dupree v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv00878
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Lawrence S. Krasner and Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dupree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDIVNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00433
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and RICHARD BOWER
Petitioner:
JAMES W. VANDIVNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOPER v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2019cv05604
Petitioner:
HOWARD COOPER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE S. KRASNER PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAUNDERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05556
Petitioner:
SAHEED O. SAUNDERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
